With the assistance from GYLA’s office in Tbilisi, a person illegally dismissed from a public school was restored to work and compensated for missed salary
A lawyer from GYLA’s office in Tbilisi was representing interests of M.B., the teacher dismissed from her work at public school on grounds of para.1d, Article 37 and para.3, Article 38 of the Labor Code of Georgia. By January 25, 2013 decision, the Supreme Court found incorrect legal interpretation of the rule of dissolution of labor agreement made by the first instance court and the Appellate Court and the case was remanded to the Appellate Court.
By the decision of Appellate Court, the claim was satisfied and the fact of illegal dismissal from the secondary school was determined. Consequently, the court repealed the order on termination of labor agreement and M.B. was restored on former position. The employer, public school, was ordered to pay monthly GEL 294,80 for missed salaries for the period from August 20, 2011 to April 30, 2013.
With the assistance from GYLA’s Gori Office, one more illegally dismissed teacher was restored to former position under the court’s decision
A lawyer from GYLA’s Gori office was representing interests of M.A., the deputy director in public school of Tiniskhidi village, dismissed from her work on grounds of the director’s order as per para.1.d, Article 37. M.A. considered that her dismissal was illegal and politically motivated, reasoned for her son’s dissenting political opinion.
On April 4, 2013 Tbilisi Appellate Court satisfied her claim, invalidated order of the public school director and M.A. was restored to her former position. Furthermore, she will be compensated for the missed salary.
Head of Adjara High Council renounced his accusations against the journalist
A lawyer from GYLA’s Adjara branch was representing interests of N.K., a journalist for “Interpressnews” agency. The applicant N.K. lodged a case against the head of High Council of Adjara autonomous republic for breach of his honor, dignity and business reputation. The case concerned February 11, 2013 incident during the Monday traditional briefing of the High Council. Namely A.B. called publicly the journalist N.K. a liar and accused him of dissemination of false information. At the trial the parties have negotiated. On April 29, 2013 A.B., head of High council of Adjara Autonomous Republic announced to the journalists that information released by N.K. was correct and his own previous statement was false. Since parties have negotiated the court terminated the proceeding.
With the assistance from GYLA’s Gori Office minors received alimony
Lawyer from GYLA’s Gori office represented M.T.’s interests on alimony case litigated by Gori regional court. By the decision of March 14, 2013 of the same court, the respondent A.N. was ordered payment of alimony in favour of three minors in the amount of GEL 210.
2. GYLA’s Gori office was representing the applicant I.D.’s interests in alimony case. By April 5, decision of Khashuri regional court, the respondent P.S. was ordered payment of monthly 70 GEL as, alimony in favour of N.S.
With GYLA’s assistance the beneficiary will receive outstanding salary
The lawyer from GYLA’s Rustavi Office represented applicant L.T.’s interests in a civil case litigated by Rustavi City Court and claimed payment of outstanding salary. The court partially satisfied the claim and ordered the respondent “Rusenergoservice” LLC to compensate Gel 500 for the outstanding salary.
With the assistance from GYLA’s Dusheti office, the beneficiary managed to register immovable property in a Public Register
GYLA’s Dusheti office was representing N.I.’s interests in registration service of Dusheti Public Register. N.I. applied to the service for registration of immovable property (land plot of 1500 square meters and a house located thereon) and submitted acceptance-delivery act of a plot as a title verifying document. According to the decision of January 30, 2013 of Dusheti registration service, registration proceeding was terminated on N.I.’s application and he was asked to submit additionally the document verifying title or use of the property. With assistance of GYLA’s Dusheti office, N.I. filed administrative complaint to National Agency of Public Register claiming registration of immovable property and invalidation of decision on suspension of registration. Administrative complaint was satisfied by the Public Register and N.I. managed to register her title on real property.
