• request from public or private entities evidence necessary for providing defense 

• file in court a motion for search and seizure

• appeal a verdict and other decisions made in legal proceedings in best interests of defendant

 

The civil society supported and approved the foregoing initiative of the government as it significantly improved effectiveness of defense, promoted adversarial proceedings and provided guarantees for realization of fair trial. 

 

The Parliament of Georgia adopted the legal draft with two readings and significant modifications. In particular, defense attorney has not been granted with the right to request information from private or public entities, while enactment of the right to file a motion in court for search and seizure was postponed until September 1, 2014. 

 

Clearly, these modifications will hinder effective realization of the right to defense, which in its turn will deteriorate the quality of administration of justice in Georgia. Notably, such restrictions placed on the rights of defense have been criticized by lawyers and civil society representatives on a number of occasions. 

 

On May 1, 2013, during the meeting of the parliament’s legal affairs committee, the foregoing draft law was adopted with the third hearing, while postponement of enactment of the defense’s right to file a motion for search and seizure was justified by the fact that “the office of the prosecutor is not ready for it yet”. Final draft was adopted with the third reading at the plenary session. 

 

We believe that whether the office of the prosecutor is ready or not is not a valid argument to justify the postponement, which in its turn will hinder effective realization of the right to defense. Furthermore, same justification can be used to delay enactment of new regulations not favored by the office of the prosecutor or the state, which will have an adverse impact on the quality of justice in Georgia.